Remix.run Logo
▲ dirck-norman a day ago

Most CEOs and managers lose their jobs for it if it’s undisclosed.

The board can’t trust Huang if he lies repeatedly and breaks company code of conduct.

▲ a day ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
▲threethirtytwo a day ago | parent | prev [-]

No they don’t. The president didn’t even lose his job for putting his dick in a secretary’s mouth.

A lot of it is just silently ignored if found out.

▲dirck-norman 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A presidential impeachment that votes along partisan lines has little to do with corporate policies.

It seems you have little argument here.

Nestlé, Astronomer, Kohl's, Norfolk Southern, BP, NBCUniversal, McDonald's, HP, CBOE - all have removed CEOs for undisclosed company relationship.

The only ones that survive are owners with majority stakes, which is very obviously a personal conflict.

▲threethirtytwo 9 hours ago | parent [-]

>A presidential impeachment that votes along partisan lines has little to do with corporate policies.

Policies that don't exist. They voted him out, he wasn't terminated because of a no fucking employees policy.

Also Leading groups as a CEO and leading the country as a president is quite similar in many respects. Fucking direct reports in both cases is frowned upon so I don't think you know what you're talking about.

>Nestlé, Astronomer, Kohl's, Norfolk Southern, BP, NBCUniversal, McDonald's, HP, CBOE - all have removed CEOs for undisclosed company relationship.

I bet you all of those were just cover stories. There were alterior motives. And I bet you there's hundreds more stories of CEO's having affairs with employees and NOT getting ousted or caught.

▲Kwpolska a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Firing the president of Trumpistan is much harder than firing the CEO of a public corporation.