only if he knew right? otherwise he's just having an affair.... that the government knew about..... and didn't tell him.... because there's no evidence of anything untoward....

This is the part people discount. Any actual attempt to go after Jensen will run into the public reporting that the government was suspicious of the maybe spy’s relationship with Jensen, and it chose not to tell him about it. Jensen has ignorance handed to him on a silver platter.

> only if he knew right

How can he not know he was sleeping with a customer and a direct report?

> he's just having an affair

Interesting use of the word "an" and "just."

> that the government knew about

Because of an investigation into illegal smuggling.

> and didn't tell him

Is that a judgement of whether he's a good steward of a multi-trillion dollar monopoly?

> because there's no evidence of anything untoward

Right, because the current administration only acts upon evidence and definitely not self-enrichment and cronyism.

Wow, how can every single word be such complete bs?

He probably knew about two of them being his workplace subordinates.

Funnily enough, all of these things are avoidable if you just don't go around having affairs in the first place.