| ▲ | King-Aaron a day ago |
| There's this little part of me wondering if this was all known about for a long time, and the sudden release of information about all three women is coordinated for some nefarious business reason. |
|
| ▲ | CoolestBeans a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| The affairs were probably open secrets to those high up for a while. Once Jensen's reputation passes a perceived point of no return, it makes sense for the other higher ups to leak everything they know to the media to shorten the duration of the scandal. The worst has happened, their action will not change, so no need to drag it out. |
|
| ▲ | mixmastamyk a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Whitehouse knew it months ago… why is it coming out after election? Not sure how it would have impacted it beforehand. |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross a day ago | parent | next [-] | | > why is it coming out after election? Jensen had the choice of coming clean like this, where half of Silicon Valley is rallying to his defence and he remains a multi-billionaire (and maybe saves his marriage), or having this exposed by the new Congress, at which point all manner of punitive countermeasures against Nvidia are on the table. Currently, Energy & Commerce and Oversight & Investigations are asleep. Come January, they won't be. Huang, like a lot of Silicon Valley, thought their guy would stay in power and protect them. | |
| ▲ | King-Aaron a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Maybe a way to dump stocks without everyone screaming insider trading. | |
| ▲ | Markoff a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | better question would be why is it coming out before trump's visit to China next week, let's not forget the first story was about Chinese spy, it's a bit of strange coincidence there is possibility someone overplayed their cards and didn't think of possible consequences, OTOH maybe they wanted to kill two birds with one stone |
|
|
| ▲ | famouswaffles a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| With this kind of status and notoriety, so many eyes are on you, it's hard to keep this a secret from everyone, especially when it's happening in the workplace. |
|
| ▲ | sho_hn a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Powerful men cheating is often normalized in their immediate environment. Jensen was seen with both women many times. It's the Chinese spy and export ban skirt angle that made it untenable. Cf. the open secret nature around the entire Epstein cabal. |
|
| ▲ | hn_throwaway_99 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > and the sudden release of information about all three women is coordinated for some nefarious business reason. This framing is plain silly because it ignores the sequence of events. NVidia conducted an investigation after Huang admitted to having an affair with someone the US Government believed to be a Chinese spy, and in any case NVidia sold billions worth of embargoed chips to that company (and now it seems we have some proof per another HN front page story that the latest leading Chinese open source models were trained on embargoed NVidia chips). So then the other 2 instances of infidelity came out in the course of the investigation - of course as they definitely should, otherwise it would be a really shitty investigation! And sure, it was known by at least some number of other NVidia employees that Huang had relationships with subordinates (at least according to reporting). But that doesn't change the fact that Huang's relationship with Alice Huang was not known (and in fact denied by Jensen Huang) before this all went down. It's not like Huang's 3 paramours got together before the investigation started in some sort of nefarious plot. |
| |
|
| ▲ | Markoff a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| trump is visiting China next week and the first story was about mistress being Chinese spy, so it makes you wonder whether this benefits China, Trump or US interests (don't confuse the latter two, they are two completely different things), I don't think China would leak "Chinese spy" story unless they are playing some serious 4D chess, which leaves you with two main options |
|
| ▲ | monideas a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | aurareturn a day ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm more convinced by the hour that it's either OpenAI/Anthropic and their backers or some Chinese entity who set this up to get him removed. | | |
| ▲ | jb1991 a day ago | parent [-] | | What would be the motivation for OpenAI or anthropic | | |
| |
| ▲ | jbeyer a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Jensen was the one pushing to get more chips into China. So China's master stroke was....to get him fired? | | |
| ▲ | monideas a day ago | parent | next [-] | | They have the chips they need for now and now they need time to catch up on EUV lithography. The idea that NVIDIA would continue whatever arrangement they had under increasing pressure is really childish. | |
| ▲ | aurareturn a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Have you noticed that China has not approved any Nvidia chips imports into China even after Trump has approved? |
| |
| ▲ | King-Aaron a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think it will become obvious who is pulling the strings when they decide on who takes the keys after Jensen. | | |
| ▲ | antonvs a day ago | parent [-] | | Collette Kress is interim CEO. It might be hard to weave that into your conspiracy theory. | | |
| ▲ | King-Aaron a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Isn't she a temporary fill?
I'd be expecting some maga lackey to be parachuted in by old Don. | | |
| ▲ | antonvs a day ago | parent [-] | | Yes, hence the "interim" title. But I think you're trying to connect the dots a bit too hard. First, Trump is not competent enough for the kind of manipulation you're describing. Second, the power relationship mostly flows the other way - megacorps have more control over the government than the other way around. That's rather the whole point of the current system. Third, corporations still have checks and balances that work quite well - Nvidia has a board filled with powerful people who aren't likely to stand by and watch the company get hamstrung by the dementia patient in chief. It's true that their are scenarios in which pressure could be applied, e.g. accept this CEO and the government will allow you to sell to China - but Trump can't make deals like that in a vacuum, he'd get hard pushback from the anti-China hawks in the government. The idea of an authoritarian president as an all-powerful puppetmaster is a conspiracy fantasy. The reality is that there are all sorts of competing powers acting in their own self-interest. Even the trillionaires don't get what they want all the time, as the case of Musk clearly demonstrates. |
| |
| ▲ | monideas a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | jb1991 a day ago | parent [-] | | This might be the most blatantly prejudicial comment I’ve ever seen posted on this website in the many years I’ve been visiting here. Prejudicial, and easily disproven… as all prejudice is. | | |
| ▲ | monideas a day ago | parent [-] | | I don’t know what “prejudicial” even means in this context | | |
| ▲ | antonvs 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | I mean, you could just look it up. In this case, the relevant definitions include "based on or causing prejudice - a bias or a preconceived opinion, idea, or belief about something" and "harmful, damaging, or causing disadvantage to someone or something." But hey, not wanting to learn is consistent with the flagged comment you posted earlier. Simple refutation of your point: do you really think that there's no woman who could have done a better job as US president over the last couple of years? Maybe someone who knows what "prejudicial" means, or is capable of looking it up? When your thought process is corrupted by bigotry, you ignore differences in individual attributes and capabilities, both within groups that you're biased against, as well as in the groups that you identify with. (Side note, this is classic identity politics, so if you've ever railed against that, you might want to check a mirror.) It's essentially the way that primitive tribespeople thought and behaved thousands of years ago, but some people seem unable to overcome that irrationality, even with the benefit of education. |
|
|
|
|
|
|