| ▲ | gunalx a day ago |
| I'm so confused by their new naming scheme. What was wrong with number and pro/flash/flash lite. |
|
| ▲ | drusepth a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| My best guess is because models are segmenting more into BiS at specific tasks in a way that's orthogonal to small/good/better/best framing. Kind of the same framing as car models, where each one has its own pros and cons vs all other models, instead of being strictly better/worse or just smarter/faster/cheaper. |
|
| ▲ | magguzu a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There's an alternate timeline where this is called Bard Hydrogen. I've accepted Google is just bad at names. |
| |
| ▲ | CobrastanJorji a day ago | parent [-] | | I still giggle about the time they just named their product the top four layers of their team's org chart: "Google Play Music All-Access" |
|
|
| ▲ | jakedowns a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| seriously... S / M / L
why does everything have to be a branding/marketing exercise? |
| |
| ▲ | zaphirplane a day ago | parent | next [-] | | I wondered the same as a kid about cars, maker - model - variant would just be nice if it was consistent. Anyways when a new model is released they want to have some interest and hopefully some tyre kickers will stick and hoping some social medial coverage | |
| ▲ | pavo-etc a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | then they can do XL 2xl 3xl when they want to go further | |
| ▲ | Barbing a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | large, gigantic, and humongous - like NASA toilet gear |
|
|
| ▲ | apt-apt-apt-apt a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| gemini argon carbon hydrogen antigravity orchestrator pro flash flash-lite Really |
| |
| ▲ | pants2 a day ago | parent [-] | | It's additionally confusing to me because Hydrogen < Carbon < Argon on the periodic table, but Hydrogen < Argon < Carbon in Google's models. |
|
|
| ▲ | arccy a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| just learn some chemistry... |
| |
| ▲ | jatora a day ago | parent [-] | | maybe you should learn some chemistry. if you know chemistry, the progression of Argon, Carbon, Hydrogen... doesn't make much sense | | |
| ▲ | Rexxar 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | But now we can have a Methane agent team with 4 Hydrogen agents directed by one Carbon agent. | |
| ▲ | gunalx 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes. Its extra confusing knowing the periodic table and atomic weights. At least argon carbon was in alphabetical order or something. But I really think they could have just picked noble gasses if they wanted elements. |
|
|