Maybe but their conclusion(s) points to they're not including the full picture, and most people on here don't actually engage - or not in good faith, or I-you'll find quickly they fall for logical fallacies, etc.

I agree circular financing is a problem - but the CEO will have practically zero to do with that, and that they have to play the game everyone else is playing.

There's far more serious financial fraud strategies being use, that even Elon was afraid to specify on Joe Rogan podcast awhile back - afraid it'd get him assassinated, which he said in half-jest.

And you don't think US intelligence agencies knew immediately the CEO of Nvidia was being courted by a spy - but allowed it to continue? Who knows, maybe this has all been long-term pre-planned, all part of theatre towards what end - God only knows.

▲

svnt a day ago | parent [-]

> I agree circular financing is a problem - but the CEO will have practically zero to do with that

I am sure you understand many things, but this is not one of them.

	▲	loceng 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You made a claim - now support your claim by providing your supportive arguments. You've not convinced me of anything - other than you're either lazy and/or don't know how to actually convince people of arguments, if your claim even turns out to be correct. So instead, you're currently lazy - and got a quick dopamine reward hit, for simply hitting a few keys - to make a claim, which is easy and shallow-empty on its own. Why do you think I don't understand this?