|
| ▲ | ilteris a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| I use argon and opus daily and I can tell you I have to use opus to review argon because argon goes and build things and also creates bunch of bugs along with it. I wish it weren't but that's the reality. It's great with deep cross inspection better than claude but it's slow and still need review by another frontier model. |
| |
| ▲ | p_l 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I solved some of that with running a very biased subagent (so fresh context) but using same model (back still with 3.8 and 4-Argon). The problem is when 3.8 or Argon were reviewing things with context poisoned by what they were working with, as gemini models generally feel over optimistic about things. | |
| ▲ | vrosas a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I can say the exact opposite was also true? No model was able to one-shot perfect solutions in my reasonably complex codebase and always required a through red-team by at least one other model. Doesn't mean one model is bad and another is better, just means no model is perfect. |
|
|
| ▲ | pietz a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Whatever they thought of when they said "measured"? Is that too much to ask? Ok, you're either a troll or you objectively don't know what you're talking about. Google should be ashamed they even released 3.8 Flash. They published models with such high frequency and always made a huge jump on benchmarks. Then they were caught, when a new version of AA came out and their numbers dropped like a stone. https://maxxbench.unlap.ai/ |
| |
| ▲ | Citizen_Lame 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | It does feel strange seeing these Google stans, I use all 3 at the same time (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) and Gemini is weakest by far, it's not even contest. Only useful stuff is web re/search. |
|