| ▲ | dzonga a day ago |
| so there's potentially undiscovered planets in our own neighborhood ? |
|
| ▲ | GolfPopper a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yep. Who knows, maybe there's a sub-dwarf of 10 Jupiter masses faintly emitting in the infrared out there. |
| |
| ▲ | sapiogram 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Jupiter-mass objects are vanishingly unlikely to be orbiting the sun, they would have been found by infrared surveys. | |
| ▲ | pmontra a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why not? Blindsight by Peter Watts got one, Big Ben. |
|
|
| ▲ | vkou a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes. The Kuiper belt is full of massive, yet-to-be-documented asteroids, planetoids, comets, and dwarf planets. |
| |
| ▲ | euroderf 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | But then with the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud you're getting into interstellar space, yes ? As space-based telescopes improve by another order of magnitude or two (one hopes), will we need a new term for drifting objects gravitationally influenced both by our Sol and by (say) the Centauris ? Speaking of which, TIL there's been more discovered in those systems. There's Alpha Centauri A B & C (C is a.k.a. Proxima Centauri) AND Beta Centauri A B & C. You can't tell your players without a scorecard. | | |
| ▲ | mr_toad 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | > But then with the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud you're getting into interstellar space, yes ? The Kuiper belt is inside the heliosphere, the Oort cloud is outside it. |
|
|