| ▲ | hdgvhicv a day ago |
| Ok so we have 50 planets? |
|
| ▲ | whiskers a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| I mean, why not? |
| |
| ▲ | jandrese a day ago | parent | next [-] | | It would make the mnemonic for memorizing the order of the planets very long and difficult for the children to remember. My Very Elegant Mother Just Served Us Nachos | | | |
| ▲ | mr_toad 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Fifty is an undercount by many orders of magnitude. Several thousand TNOs have been cataloged, there are probably millions of them. | |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | sandworm101 a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes. I wouldn't call a dwarf person any less of a person, nor would i refer to a dwarf planet as being any less a planet. Between the terrestrial planets, the gas giants, the ice giants, and arguably a couple of rounder moons, we have far more than 50 planets in our solar system. By some extreme definitions, Earth might not be a planet. Some say the moon is too big to qualify the earth "cleared out its orbit" criteria, making Earth-moon some sort of double planet... like Pluto-Charon. |
| |
| ▲ | GolfPopper a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Setting aside the whole "demote Pluto" and "dwarf planet" aspects, I find it amusing that we use the same term for small rocky Mercury (2,440 km radius, 5% of Earth's mass) and immense gaseous Jupiter (69,000 km radius, over 300 times Earth's mass). Only we don't, of course. Jupiter is a gas giant, while Mercury is a rocky planet, or iron planet; there's a lot of 'planet' terminology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_planet_types | | |
| ▲ | cogman10 a day ago | parent [-] | | It gets even weird when you consider Ganymede which is larger than mercury but not a planet because it's a moon. |
| |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ultimately these sorts of quibbles are fundamentally semantic in nature thus (in general) entirely pointless. It's only the subjects themselves - the myriad celestial bodies - that are interesting. | | |
| ▲ | interestica a day ago | parent [-] | | It's semantics as well as a collision with our inability to work with gradients. We can look at two colours and can name the discrete ones - but when does red stop being red? When does a species emerge? |
|
|