Remix.run Logo
▲ hdgvhicv a day ago

Ok so we have 50 planets?

▲whiskers a day ago | parent | next [-]

I mean, why not?

▲jandrese a day ago | parent | next [-]

It would make the mnemonic for memorizing the order of the planets very long and difficult for the children to remember.

My Very Elegant Mother Just Served Us Nachos

▲tapotatonumber9 a day ago | parent | next [-]

… Picante?

▲ageedizzle a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Nature doesn’t care about what kids can or cannot easily remember.

▲mr_toad 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Fifty is an undercount by many orders of magnitude. Several thousand TNOs have been cataloged, there are probably millions of them.

▲ a day ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲sandworm101 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes. I wouldn't call a dwarf person any less of a person, nor would i refer to a dwarf planet as being any less a planet. Between the terrestrial planets, the gas giants, the ice giants, and arguably a couple of rounder moons, we have far more than 50 planets in our solar system.

By some extreme definitions, Earth might not be a planet. Some say the moon is too big to qualify the earth "cleared out its orbit" criteria, making Earth-moon some sort of double planet... like Pluto-Charon.

▲GolfPopper a day ago | parent | next [-]

Setting aside the whole "demote Pluto" and "dwarf planet" aspects, I find it amusing that we use the same term for small rocky Mercury (2,440 km radius, 5% of Earth's mass) and immense gaseous Jupiter (69,000 km radius, over 300 times Earth's mass). Only we don't, of course. Jupiter is a gas giant, while Mercury is a rocky planet, or iron planet; there's a lot of 'planet' terminology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_planet_types

▲cogman10 a day ago | parent [-]

It gets even weird when you consider Ganymede which is larger than mercury but not a planet because it's a moon.

▲fc417fc802 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Ultimately these sorts of quibbles are fundamentally semantic in nature thus (in general) entirely pointless. It's only the subjects themselves - the myriad celestial bodies - that are interesting.

▲interestica a day ago | parent [-]

It's semantics as well as a collision with our inability to work with gradients. We can look at two colours and can name the discrete ones - but when does red stop being red? When does a species emerge?