Imagine if RMS had access to Claude and wasn't activated by the need to modify printer software himself. We might not have the FSF, GNU, GPL, or anything downstream from those!

▲

TimTheTinker a day ago | parent | next [-]

If he were in this thread, I think he'd warn us to avoid nonfree LLMs and not to let LLMs lull us into being comfortable while we still lack software freedom.

▲

abirch a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The FSF people are right, the value of the software isn't the software it's the support. If you're business model involved a rundle, you're going to need a new one.

	▲	rvz a day ago \| parent [-]
		What is the point of "support" if the LLM can do it cheaper if not for $0? The FSF also did not think about another freedom that is included when work becomes so cheap it is essentially free: "The freedom to not pay for your software or for support."

▲

MisterTea a day ago | parent | prev [-]

He would require access to Claud's source code.