More importantly, Anthropic has been consistent with their naming convention for years (two, yes, but plural years) now. OpenAI and Google’s habit of changing naming conventions semi-regularly makes their products harder to grok.

▲

BobaFloutist a day ago | parent | next [-]

Using the word "grok" here offers some great "Whose on first?" opportunities.

▲

scottLobster a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Android version names were random desserts for the longest time. People are expecting too much from Google here

	▲	gloxkiqcza a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They weren't random. They were alphabetical. The first letter of the name always shifted to the next letter in the alphabet. • Cupcake (Android 1.5) • Donut (Android 1.6) • Eclair (Android 2.0–2.1) • Froyo (Android 2.2) • Gingerbread (Android 2.3) • Honeycomb (Android 3.0–3.2) • Ice Cream Sandwich (Android 4.0) • Jelly Bean (Android 4.1–4.3) • KitKat (Android 4.4) • Lollipop (Android 5.0–5.1) • Marshmallow (Android 6.0) • Nougat (Android 7.0–7.1) • Oreo (Android 8.0–8.1) • Pie (Android 9)
	▲	KeplerBoy a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		They were alphabetically ordered random desserts. It wasn't too bad.
	▲	oblio a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		This isn't the same situation. Android versions always had 2 parts: the number and the name. They were always easy to follow. Using constantly changing names for tiers is a bad idea. Unless the tiers are pre-existing (bronze, silver, gold).