| ▲ | baobabKoodaa a day ago |
| No sexual harrasment has been suggested, except by you, from your imagination |
|
| ▲ | twodave a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Ok, well there’s already a third mistress reported so why don’t we both sit back and see how my position ages :) |
| |
| ▲ | baobabKoodaa a day ago | parent [-] | | Are you genuinely confused over the difference between "mistress" and "sexual harassment"? | | |
| ▲ | twodave a day ago | parent [-] | | No, I don’t think I am. You can disagree with me without me being confused. | | |
| ▲ | wiseowise 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There was no sexual harassment reported. Having multiple partners is not a sexual harassment. | |
| ▲ | baobabKoodaa 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Disagree" on what? There could be sexual harassment related to a mistress, but no-one has alleged that, except you. You simply made up an allegation that didn't exist. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | mcmcmc a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Someone skipped all their HR trainings |
| |
| ▲ | baobabKoodaa a day ago | parent [-] | | Who? Me or that other guy? If you want to insult someone, at least make it clear who you're trying to insult. | | |
| ▲ | mcmcmc 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sleeping with a direct report is de jure sexual harassment and a violation of hostile workplace environment laws, especially when not disclosed. If you feel insulted because someone called out your ignorance that’s on you. This is common knowledge in corporate America | | |
| ▲ | baobabKoodaa 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is not true. Go ahead, show which specific law defines all relationships with direct reports as being sexual harassment. |
| |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
