| ▲ | porphyra 13 hours ago | |
The Chinese government working hard to ban NVIDIA GPUs from the country [1][2][3]. How does it make sense that Jensen is compromised while advocating for exporting GPUs to China, which is something that primarily benefits NVIDIA (and arguably the US) while being against the Chinese interests? If he were compromised he would be like "well actually maybe I shouldn't export chips to China after all and give their domestic semiconductor industry a chance". [1] https://www.reuters.com/world/china/nvidia-chips-pile-up-hon... [2] https://ng.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/nvidia-ai-ch... [3] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-17/china-age... | ||
| ▲ | numpad0 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
They obviously need/needed as much NVIDIA as possible short term, and locally produced superior alternative ASAP long term. So one hand rushes to secure all stocks of NVIDIA prosumer and enterprise cards, while another rushes to ban it. | ||
| ▲ | guerrilla 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Long-term plans vs. short-term plans? | ||
| ▲ | kortilla 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
China doesn’t want regular businesses to have them illegally. That’s not the same as China not wanting them legitimately. | ||