Remix.run Logo
▲ rolosa 6 hours ago

I don't care about shareholder value. There is Schaudenfreude in seeing an AI/tech billionaire go down.

▲shimman 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Fully agreed. The more we take these people down, the better society is will be.

▲NetMageSCW 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The more people who exist that witch-hunt for no actual reason the worse our society is.

▲rockostrich 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

He's still one of the richest people on earth. I wouldn't exactly call that "going down."

▲m4rtink 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, he might very well end up in jail.

▲mrandish 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> he might very well end up in jail

That's incredibly unlikely. NVidia and Megaspeed's relationship has been under constant separate parallel investigations by the Justice and Commerce Depts going back to the Biden administration. There have been no charges and Megaspeed was never even added to the blocked Entities List which would instantly ban all sales, despite the US govt being free to do so at any time with no justification or explanation needed.

It appears two things are simultaneously true:

- Thousands of banned GPUs were diverted to China.

- NVidia meticulously verified export licenses and complied with every U.S. law, export control and KYC regulation.

The under-reported fact is that while the US Govt chose not to add Megaspeed to the banned list, NVidia voluntarily placed Megaspeed on their own blocklist and stopped selling GPUs to them in June 2025. This was because the law requires NVidia to block any company they "know or reasonably suspect" is violating export controls. There is an extensive framework of Red Flags a supplier is required to check and certify are 'cleared'. The penalties for failing to do so are the same as violating export controls on cruise missiles (up to 20 years in jail, $1M per GPU ). And they can apply personally to each employee who knew. So, NVidia cut off one of their largest South Asian customers ~18 months ago, despite Jensen banging the customer's board member.

No, I can't explain it either. But those are the facts per WSJ & NYT reporting. The meta-subtext here is there have been two opposing factions on China policy inside the White House, NSC, and U.S. intelligence community since the Biden era. They are each constantly trying to sway Trump, who vacillates between them (as seen by inconsistent US policy swings). One of those factions leaked the 6 month-old Alice story a week ago in the hope of blocking Jensen's influence and access to Trump. It worked (probably better than expected). Now that Jensen is both out of NVidia and politically toxic, neither faction cares about him.

▲undersuit 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, show me people are not buying Nvidia GPUs because of this and maybe I'll sell.