| ▲ | DaSHacka 7 hours ago | |
Only because it benefits NVIDIA to have more potential customers in the shovel market to mine gold individually versus consolidating within a few providers (where the backend tooling becomes irrelevant to the consumers, and OpenAI & Co could freely change GPU manufacturers on a whim or move things in-house). | ||
| ▲ | sfink 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Yep, it's kind of the old "if you owe the bank $100, it's your problem. If you owe $100M, it's the bank's problem." NVIDIA would love to diversify its customer base. | ||
| ▲ | OrangeDelonge 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
No he did it because he was such a good guy!!!! | ||
| ▲ | pembrook an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Wait, so you're telling me that NVIDIA has a profit incentive to bolster the AI market to be full of competitors and not turn it into a monopoly? And that as a byproduct we profit by not living under an Anthropic quasi-religious doom cult monopoly, with open access to competing models? It's almost as if the competing self-interest that drives the invisible hand of the market is a positive force for value creation in the world. | ||