| ▲ | twodave 13 hours ago | |||||||
They may not think about it that way, but if one of that couple got a promotion from the other then every other person on the team pretty much has grounds for a law suit. There are reasons these rules exist, and the CEO of a high profile company has no excuse not to know them all. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kridsdale1 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
She was a direct report of the CEO. There are no promotions possible. She was max level already. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | BeetleB 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> but if one of that couple got a promotion from the other then every other person on the team pretty much has grounds for a law suit. Extremely rare (winning such a lawsuit). Prior to these kinds of rules becoming the norm, how often did anyone win such a lawsuit? It's a rounding error close to 0. There are plenty of publicized cases where one party openly stated she got promotions because of her affair with a senior. No lawsuits were even filed in the ones I know. I'm in favor of such rules precisely because it's hard to win such a suit. | ||||||||