| ▲ | Matl 2 days ago |
| Elon Musk has an AI bot generating explicit images without consent, regardless of age, yet nobody's firing him. While Jensen seems like an egomaniac who deserves what happened to him, there's a part of me that feels some China hawks had fingers in his firing, it must not sit well with them than America's most valuable company is not in the hands of the old guard. |
|
| ▲ | KingMob 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Musk has 82% of the voting shares of SpaceX, which owns Twitter. He can't be fired, no matter how much he might deserve it. |
|
| ▲ | Andrew_nenakhov 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That is simply not true, Grok refuses to make explicit images, and with uploaded media it refuses to do even mildly enticing ones. * * — We did a test of it after similar claim a few weeks ago, and what pushed us to do a research is because my friend who works in a hotel industry was getting moderation blocks on Grok left and right — they now use only AI images to not bother with copyright trolls ever again who threaten lawsuits for things like improperly credited bought stock photo — and in their case moderation was a serious hindrance for creating images. |
| |
| ▲ | Matl 2 days ago | parent [-] | | So all of [1] is made up? 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_sexual_deepfake_scandal | | |
| ▲ | Andrew_nenakhov 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't know what was in back 2025. We tested it late October, 2026. Couldn't generate anything explicit at all. | | |
| ▲ | Matl 2 days ago | parent [-] | | There was no action taken against him when it was most definitely happening was the point, which stands. | | |
| ▲ | Andrew_nenakhov a day ago | parent [-] | | Instead of blahblahblahing endlessly you could just go render an explicit photo on Grok and post it here to prove your point. I'm rather confident that you would not be able to do that. However, I'm also confident that instead of doing that you'll continue spreading information that is now obsolete and incorrect: in your original post you said that Musk has a bot, but when confronted with the current state of affairs continue to cite Wikipedia about what Musk had a year ago. | | |
| ▲ | Matl 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | Stop with the gaslighting, Elon's not hiring you anyway. There's plenty of evidence that it was going on in 2025, there were no consequences back then. It doesn't matter whether it continues to this day or not, after he's taken SpaceX public and so unnecessary risk was no longer worth taking, that's misdirection, it was ongoing for months without any legal or professional consequences. That's the point. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
