| ▲ | ProblemExplorer 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
You are repeating an argument a lot of people make so you're not alone in this. > But if you had to make the old car now, you might be able to make way more of them for the same inputs All these arguments miss that inflation is a proxy for the improvement of quality of living over time. You don't make a 1998 Camry in 2026 because the 2026 Camry is a much better car for the end user than the 1998 Camry. The 1998 Camry is easier to maintain and lasts a long time but if the end user doesn't keep a car longer than 7 years and they have to pay a mechanic to change their oil, they dont care about "easier to maintain and lasts a long time". They care about AirPlay, Remote Start, Parking Assist and ass warmers. No 1998 Camry has any of that. You could chop wood for heat, grow your own vegetables and meat, living off a few hundred dollars a month if you wanted but most people won't do that because it's not very entertaining and a lot of hard manual labor. Things cost more over time because people demand more over time. More things cost more, so people demand more money to get paid. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | slopinthebag 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
cheap cars would sell like hotcakes. so i don't think what you say is true. especially with inflation for things like food or shelter - it's not like the same bag of chips that doubled in price has more "features", if anything it just has less volume. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | timacles a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Your argument does not apply to anything that has happened in the last 20 years. | |||||||||||||||||