Remix.run Logo
▲ lurker919 15 hours ago

Seems like tragedy of the commons principle - if everyone was chilling and working 20 hour weeks, I'd do the same. But people hustle and grind to get rich so that's the culture I have to adapt to.

▲MattDamonSpace 15 hours ago | parent [-]

No,if you wanted to have a 1950s quality of life, you could do so on 15hrs or less today. Just give up your indoor plumbing, washer/dryer, AC, etc etc

▲hdgvhicv 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We had indoor plumbing in 1950s. Giving up the washer saves a days salary.

▲Exoristos 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is a new one. I usually see we are better off than in the Fifties because they had fewer entertainment options, or inanities like that. But you posit they didn't have plumbing?

▲fooo1882992 9 hours ago | parent [-]

"In 1990, only 1 percent of our homes lacked complete plumbing facilities. But, things were much different in 1940, when nearly half lacked complete plumbing. Then, about ten States had rates approaching or exceeding 70 percent. In succeeding decades, the proportion of homes lacking complete plumbing dropped dramatically, falling to about one-third in 1950 and one- sixth in 1960. It is interesting to note the States with the lowest percent- age of such homes in 1940 were higher than Alaska, which topped the 1990 list.

Complete plumbing facilities are defined as hot and cold piped water, a bath- tub or shower, and a flush toilet. In earlier censuses, these facilities must have been for exclusive use of a housing unit's inhabitants; this requirement was dropped in 1990"

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/dec/coh-plumb...

▲smallmancontrov 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What washer/dryer do you propose buying so that the savings compensate for the inflation in health care, housing, and education?

▲skinfaxi 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sure if I can buy real estate too at 1950s prices!