| ▲ | lavendermon 2 days ago | |||||||||||||
Apple has a fascinating history of waiting and seeing how a market develops before entering with a better product and eventually dominating, the iPod and iPhone are two examples. It seems they may be building a strong position to pull that off again in the personal assistant AI category ChatGPT is trying to dominate. I enjoy watching the slow burn approach Apple is deploying as they quietly gear up to offer some % of local inference on iPhones to provide most of the AI services consumers want. Local inference could enable a very low price point for AI services that Apple would leverage alongside their massive ecosystem advantages and privacy claims to compete very effectively for personal assistant AI subscriptions. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | QuantumNomad_ 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> the personal assistant AI category Didn’t Apple sort of already enter this market early-on with their subpar Siri? I’ve been an iPhone and MacBook Pro user for years, but each time when I set up a new Apple device the first thing I do is say no to anything Siri, and also turning off additional Siri related settings. To the best of my knowledge, Siri is worse than useless, and I haven’t regretted staying away from it. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | elpakal 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Agreed, but I wonder how that plays out without them entering the frontier model space. I just downloaded the new foundation models cli and ran some inference on my Mac, it wasn't great, but it was neat to see. I asked which model it was using and it said gpt 4o mini. An on-device, 100% private AI assistant seems like it could be so big that it could be a legitimate threat to the frontier model providers they are partnering with right now, imho. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | joshheitzman 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Apple or Steve Jobs? It seems like that was Steve Jobs doing as Apple hasn't done it without him. | ||||||||||||||