I'm not arguing that myself. But in general, you and I, hopefully, agree that ethics already come into it (games praise itself, and IGF), and understand that IGF was never only about simply ending up with technically the best game full stop. There are other considerations. We can't and don't wholesale dismiss all considerations based on the end quality of things. So "Does IGF want to reward human achievement or recognize the best indie games" is misframed because it already wasn't about the latter.