Emotionally I agree with you but practically I don't. Who today is actually "taking full responsibility" for the software that they write? AI written or not? Aren't all licenses and user agreements laced with "use at your own risk" and suitability clauses? If my software has a bug in it that causes a catastrophic head-crash in your hard drive, should I be expected to reimburse you for the cost of the drive and the value of its content? Could you clarify what "full responsibility" you're hoping to see?

The standard might be higher than currently practiced in many places also pre AI. From that perspective, I guess what I would want is that AI is not used as another tool to (further) absolve responsibility. "AI did it" is not a valid excuse. I must admit that I was thinking mostly inside the reponsibility software developer team when writing the comment. But it goes for entire business towards users also.

That you’ll fix it when it breaks. That you won’t compromise end-user privacy, health or their funds. That your software won’t be used to harm individuals or society. Ethical and responsible action.