| ▲ | TZubiri a day ago |
| even if it was discovered, I'd say most of the accolades go to NASA and LIDAR, the fact that AI agents were used to discover it isn't a big deal. |
|
| ▲ | sand500 21 hours ago | parent [-] |
| There are a lot of things that generate massive amounts of data(e.g. LHC, Vera Rubin). Finding something useful in the data is also challenging. Its pretty cool how low the barrier to entry is these days. |
| |
| ▲ | TZubiri 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It contributes for sure, I'm just noting that the headlines that media are producing (and people are consuming) tend to be seen through the lens of "AI is doing this" | |
| ▲ | 0815beck 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | it is just the insufferable tone of this man, i am sorry. thinking he is disrupting the field of archeology with his fresh, naive, out of the box ideas, when in fact scientists have of course looked at lidar data before. why do you think all the chatbots recommended it to him?.. also ai has been in use to search for stars in sattelite images for much longer than llms exist |
|