> I was about to analyze the short story and think about the intentions of the author, it's social commentary.

I mean, I doubt that the author just said "write me a short story" and that's it. So, there are still some intentions behind the text that the author put into the prompt.

Although, I agree that I'd rather read the prompt [0].

[0] https://claytonwramsey.com/blog/prompt/

▲

saulpw 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

I challenge the author to post their prompts and unless they one-shotted this (which seems unlikely), then I can basically guarantee you that you would not rather read the prompts. In particular because 'the prompts' are a back-and-forth with the chatbot and if you think you don't like reading an AI-assisted short story, you really don't like reading a chat transcript (for one thing, it'll be at least 10x as long and with a lot more and worse chatbot output that the human will try to clean up).

	▲	jacobgkau 3 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		In the context of discerning the author's social commentary intentions, both the initial prompt and the entire conversation they have correcting things would indeed be more valuable than just the output text.