| ▲ | JoshTriplett 3 hours ago | |
Per the article, even if they weren't trying to play semantic games about subsidiaries (which OIN really shouldn't allow), OIN excludes "codec" patents and considers the DisplayLink patents to be "codec" patents. | ||
| ▲ | dmitrygr 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
By some definition, anything is a codec :clownface: | ||