You shouldn't have to justify or explain not being available when it is not working hours. Turn that shit off at 5pm Friday and turn it on 8am Monday.

▲

macNchz 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You shouldn't have to, sure, but I think we've seen a monotonic progression towards the expectation of work-related availability outside of working hours for decades now.

▲

apublicfrog 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We introduced "Right to disconnect" laws in Australia years ago:

> Employees have the right to refuse contact outside their working hours unless that refusal is unreasonable. This means an employee can refuse to monitor, read or respond to contact from an employer or a third party.

We don't have "at-will employment", so you can't be fired for arbitrary reasons. And if you were to treat someone poorly or fire them for refusing to be available for free after hours, you would end up in serious trouble in front of the Fair Work Commission.

This is the main value of governments, have them regulate these things for your protection!

▲

eterm 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's not universal, there's still plenty of places to work where people respect working hours.

▲

dzhiurgis 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

To be devils advocate - do you expect your employer send flowers and give vacation days when your parents pass away? Or advance your salary if you short? Or tons of other forms of flexibility in return?

In societies where all of this is encoded in law they seem to be doing worse off than where these things are based on trust.

	▲	apublicfrog 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Australia's doing fine and we have bereavement days. Somehow our employers find the capacity to still provide flexibility. No, it would be unreasonable to expect those things from your employer and yes it's better to have employee protections actioned within the law.