| ▲ | psnehanshu 3 hours ago | |||||||
Ok, but why did they chose Sonnet in the first place? Couldn't they have chosen Haiku or GPT Luna or maybe even some small cheap Chinese model? | ||||||||
| ▲ | theshrike79 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I’m guessing accuracy. Smaller models are just THAT much more inaccurate to not make it viable. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | loafoe 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Strands decider actually uses a small cheap/free Chinese model for its base architecture: Qwen | ||||||||
| ▲ | Hamuko 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Not sure if it would even need to be a small Chinese model. Amazon would surely have the necessary hardware and infrastructure to run a bigger Chinese model with a low per-token cost too. They probably get their Sonnet at a discounted rate too since they do the inference "locally", but I imagine the savings for not having to pay Anthropic their share would still add up. | ||||||||