| ▲ | usaar333 3 hours ago | |
> Fable 5.2 is not 21 times better than GPT 6.1 Sol, I find it hard to justify this. How is this relevant? I'm willing to pay 21x more as long as the cost is less than my value of time saved | ||
| ▲ | breakwaterlabs an hour ago | parent [-] | |
Most other competitive models will do the task at 90-105% of the performance, for 50% of the cost, and 1/3 the time. AI generally underperforms human, so is "raw quality" is the only metric you would not use an AI. Time-to-completion-at-quality is usually pretty important and Fable is not good there. | ||