Remix.run Logo
▲ raincole 4 hours ago

The article clearly explains what the author/their nephew did. There is no ambiguity. One-shot never means 'so perfect there is literally nothing to be improved.' It means no back-and-forth iterations between the human in the loop and the AI.

▲thevilish 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

- In traditional ML/vision, it meant learning to recognize a new category from a single training example. - In LLM prompting, it has always, at least the last seven years, meant giving the model one example in the prompt (zero-shot, one-shot, few-shot). - Vibe coders/AI-influencers use it to mean "one-shotting" a task on the first try with no back-and-forth.

▲xdennis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

One shot is confusing precisely because it means different things in different contexts.

It can either mean: 1 prompt, or it can mean a prompt with 1 example (in which case zero-shot means 1 prompt with 0 examples).

It also has different meanings in other contexts.

▲monk_grilla 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The article includes the entire prompt OP used in the first section. I think it is pretty clear.

▲_heimdall an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

That seems less like an issue of the term having multiple meanings and more an issue of people misusing the term frequently.

People misuse the term "literally" frequently, for example, but that doesn't change the meaning of the word.