| ▲ | jkahrs595 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Is this a serious question? Why would it be satire? Is it building something you don’t like or want? Say what you actually mean. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | prmph 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
It is weird. What does "agent native" mean? This looks like work that requires the use of agents to use properly. Hence me thinking it is satire. Are we already at a point where libraries and frameworks are being written such that they require agents (from maybe paid frontier models) to properly use? We live in strange times, if so. Interestingly, I was just thinking of this problem today: how can I stick with react-like declarative UIs (like one I have developed myself) but yet have them abstracted over native UI frameworks of Apple, Android, even TUIs to produce native apps? What I would have expected is a fully deterministic runtime, compiler, or library approach to solving this, not an agent-driven "solution". | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||