| ▲ | hex4def6 3 days ago | |
Cool, I guess. I guess I'm not really sure what the point of this (100% AI generated) article is. You have a magic engine with zero details, that you're comparing against a (to me at least) obscure github project. I guess I'm not really sure what the takeaway for me is supposed to be. The benchmark setup is not detailed enough to make meaningful conclusions from it, and I guess the big takeway seems to be that a bounded cache that an engine process owns behaves better than relying on the system cache? Paste this into the claude session: "Add a section explaining the architecture of this engine, and how it compares to TUFF, EdgeMOE, etc SOTA implementations. Explain the novelty of this implementation. Show how experts are imported / evicted, and how that decision works. Also add more detail in a benchmark section about the exact testing you ran. Give test runs, upload to a git repo that links to this article. Include some charts showing test to test variance. " | ||
| ▲ | tarassenkov 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
[dead] | ||