| ▲ | Loquebantur an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
What you're looking at there is the cost/performance in inference. The "frontier". An economically successful step would be to improve training cost/frontier advance. They essentially failed at that, assuming they kept their training costs for the model step at least constant. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | XenophileJKO 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This model is on the cost performance frontier (Pareto line) from medium -> max. If you leave xhigh and max off.. you still get better performance than Opus 5.5 max Opus 5.5 Max - score 59 - cost per task - $10.04 Fable 5.2 High - score 62 - cost per task - $9.08 | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lukeschlather 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The thing is max reasoning is most effective at things which are least interesting (the ones where the answers can be validated by a computer.) I've found for a lot of tasks like image recognition, low reasoning can even be better quality than max. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rsalus an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
isn't that what Opus is for? this is the "strongest" model, not the most economical | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||