Those are both true, but I don't see how they are meant to rebut what I said.

Most people on plan use do NOT use up all their plan usage.

Users on API plans can still use Opus 5.5 which is a great model. If they want top of the line performance, they can pay more.

When another company puts out a model that undercuts Fable 5.2 on price at similar performance, Anthropic will put out Opus 6 and undercut them right back. That's how the wheel turns. This is just part of the cycle.

It rebuts what you said because your statement that "the cost per task matters relatively little" is not true in the slightest.

This might be true for a small portion of the user base, but it is not true as a statement of fact.