A human can be fired, or put on a PIP, and is otherwise responsible for their output.

An algorithm isn’t. I still dunno how they’re gonna square that circle.

How many humans do you need to keep around as scapegoats concurrently? I figure one with a CEO title should be enough.

They will square it by pointing out, correctly, that AI is getting better while humans are not.

The state of the art doesn't matter. Only the first couple of time derivatives matter.