| ▲ | foxtrottbravo 2 hours ago |
| What difference does it make? |
|
| ▲ | sltkr 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Many people want to avoid AI slop because it has a low signal to noise ratio. |
| |
| ▲ | foxtrottbravo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I do not share this position but I understand it may be someones legitimate opinion in general. I do not understand it here - when we are talking about a report like that. Is it better to go unreported if the alternative is that an LLM was used in the articles creation? | | |
| ▲ | sltkr 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Most people don't have time to read every article posted to Hacker News. Avoiding the AI slop in favor of human-written articles that promise a higher return on investment seems like a reasonable strategy. For that to work, AI slop must be accurately labeled as such. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Jtarii 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If I wanted to read llm output I would just load up a chatgpt tab. |
| |
| ▲ | foxtrottbravo an hour ago | parent [-] | | Should the issue be disregarded because someone else has used an LLM when producing it? Honestly asking. | | |
|
