| ▲ | gpm 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weird... I've never had problems using eTransfer from a browser (firefox) on my computer (linux)... which has got to be as untrustworthy a device as there is. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | abdullahkhalids 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Similar experience. No real problems. However, RBC limits the amount I can transfer to 2k per day from browser and like 5k per day from the app. I don't send anything from TD, but if I buy anything online half the time it forces a 2FA which requires signing into the app and confirming the transaction. I imagine signing into the app might not work nicely if I was on LineageOS. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | julianlam 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Used to be the case, yes. However even web-initiated EMTs trigger device confirmation. RBC seems to have made this mandatory for at least my account as of this summer. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MrDOS 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the last several months, eTransfers initiated from my desktop browser (Firefox on Linux, same as you) have required confirmation via the RBC app on my iPhone. Definitely seems like they have multiple scales of trustworthiness for people/devices/activity. Kind of wish they'd be more transparent about what they are, but I guess that sort of transparency can easily become a vulnerability. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||