Remix.run Logo
▲ d_silin 2 hours ago

Yet we remember the name and works of Homer, almost 3000 years old.

▲GolfPopper 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

μνάσασθαί τινά φαιμι καὶ ἕτερον ἀμμέων

"I think men will remember us even hereafter."

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:The_Poems_of_Sappho_(192...

▲grey-area 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We only have 2 books out of around 16 from Homer, so a lot has been lost already.

▲seemaze an hour ago | parent [-]

That's a fairly close correlation to the claim in TFA!

▲baxtr an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Let’s assume he was real. What’s the benefit to him that he’s remembered?

This is not a rhetorical question. Maybe some of your offspring has higher chances of survival if you’re remembered?

▲kelseyfrog an hour ago | parent [-]

Why would it need to benefit him? Couldn't it just as well benefit us?

▲da_chicken 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, except Homer is likely ahistorical.

And the Trojan Epic Cycle contained eight epic poems. We just only have two of them. We've also lost the rest of the epic poems. We have a fraction of what was considered great even 1,200 years ago.

▲NooneAtAll5 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

we even remember Ea-Nasir