> very little reason for reproducing above replacement rate.

But reproduction is below replacement rate.

And? It's only a few years since folks were deeply worried about overpopulation, and whether the earth could support 10 billion people...

▲

stavros an hour ago | parent [-]

Yeah, I don't understand how we can be worried about both things at the same time. In my view, it's good that reproduction is below replacement. Yeah, pensions won't be great, but at least we won't spread like a cancer onto a strained planet.

	▲	jacquesm 35 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That's one of the weirdest realizations I had in the Northern Territories of Canada. There are people living everywhere. Of course they must have looked at me the same way, so I can't really complain.