| ▲ | limagnolia 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Why should the GPL be the default? If you don't want your software used commercially, don't Open Source (or Free Software) it. Maybe a CC-NC license if you want to give it away for noncommercial use. The rest of us will continue to use and make OSS and enjoy it without worrying about what others are doing with it. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | globular-toast 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The GPL has nothing to do with usage and what others are doing with it. On the contrary: it explicitly provides the freedom to use the software as you wish, including for commercial use. Even Stallman is against licences that would prohibit commercial use. But the GPL goes even further than that, and this appears to be the source of your confusion. The GPL stops people redistributing the software under terms that would restrict or prohibit use, including commercial use. The GPL guarantees that anyone receiving the software now or in the future has the same rights you have. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | poulpy123 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Default for people who want their open source work to stay open source and not privatized by billionaire companies. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stavros an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Because I want to open source my software AND don't want it used commercially. What's the problem? I just use the AGPL and that's that. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||