| ▲ | jcattle 3 hours ago | |
This statement is baffling to me. 1. Wikipedia is not wikihow. It is not an aim of wikipedia to teach you how to tie a knot. 2. Youtube does not reward or otherwise provide provenance and incremental improvement. Look at the revision page for the windsor knot: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Half-Windsor_knot... There is no mechanism whatsoever on youtube to incrementally improve a video or understanding of a topic. | ||
| ▲ | joenot443 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> There is no mechanism whatsoever on youtube to incrementally improve a video or understanding of a topic. Yes there is? You've been able to trim and append end screens for years. Usually when understanding on a topic changes people upload newer videos. Do you expect the books on your shelf to update every year? What a baffling relationship with media you must have. > Youtube does not reward or otherwise provide provenance and incremental improvement. I don't think that Wikipedia rewards provenance either? The "reward" seems to be seeing your own beliefs put to text. I suppose that's what you're getting at? | ||