The real test is the creation rate for those projects.

From your list, I think most were started 15-20+ years ago[1] so your argument isn't contradicting the original point.

* * *

[1] OSM, Fandom and TV Tropes were started 22 years ago. Wikipedia itself was started 25 years ago.

The food shelf I volunteered at yesterday is a lot more than 20 years old. There'll probably not be another Wikipedia, because we already have Wikipedia. There's no point in having a second. Assembly for other things listed. We have one. Why would we need a second one to do that?

I don't know what the future will be, but the future people who live in it will know and they're going to do something. I can say that with confidence, even without knowing exactly what they're going to do.

edit: grammar - see reply for old/wrong version.

▲

Hamuko 3 hours ago | parent [-]

>There'll probably be another Wikipedia, because we already have Wikipedia. There's no point in having a second.

Unless you have a political view to push. Visit Grokipedia today!

	▲	throw0101c 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Visit Grokipedia today! "Would you like to know more?"
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]