| ▲ | simianwords 4 hours ago | |||||||
This argument sneaks in the fact that models are commodities which is NOT true. Claude has a different personality and performance than other models for example. Expect more differentiation in the future and not less. | ||||||||
| ▲ | reeredfdfdf 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
For lots of use cases you don't want the BEST model, you want the model that gets the job done for as little money as possible. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | swiftcoder 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> Claude has a different personality and performance than other models for example This kind of thing amounts to a LoRa applied to your model. There's no reason (apart from potential IP infringement) that someone else couldn't produce a "Claude LoRa" for their model (or, more likely, given the dislike for Claude's writing style, Anthropic could offer a "non-Claude LoRa" for their own models) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | rienbdj 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Claude’s personality is the worst aspect of the product! | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | dalmo3 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
"Cursor" Grok has the exact same (non-)personality as Claude. GPT has the same performance. And performance is definitely a commodity. Why wouldn't it be? | ||||||||