You are pattern matching on the "AI" part and reacting to it, but I think you should re-read the original post. The main thing seems to be some people taking this code and then reusing it without attribution (and, incidentally, trying to use AI to obfuscate this fact)

▲

trombuance 5 hours ago | parent [-]

There never needed to be attribution according to their own license, which they picked without any outside influence. Where exactly is the issue?

	▲	rtpg 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I guess they picked a license that didn’t require attribution and then decided “actually this sucks” and are changing their judgement downstream of that Sometimes some people change their mind.