The leader of the central company in the AI boom was compromised by a spy from the US’s biggest adversary while US and Chinese companies are in an AI arms race.

Would that count?

▲

fastily 5 hours ago | parent [-]

We have a sitting president who freely shares state secrets with dictators upon request. This seems rather high effort when they could’ve just asked nicely no? </s>

▲

dolebirchwood 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Is whataboutism really necessary?

	▲	fc417fc802 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It isn't whataboutism if it's directly relevant to the point at hand (as opposed to attempting to distract from it). The question posed effectively amounted to "why is this particularly noteworthy compared to everything else of a vaguely similar nature that's been going on".
	▲	fastily 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		the </s> is for sarcasm..

▲

DragonStrength 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That president's board (US voters) just put him on a much shorter leash as a result. Actions, consequences, etc.

▲

dinkumthinkum 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I know you are trying to make some point for your political team but if you look up what a fiduciary is then you will see why this would be a good thing and a way to avoid other legal issues. But I know, OMB and all that!