| ▲ | flowerlad 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Now we have to re-evaluate all his statements in favor of selling to China. For example, we want China to build on "our stack". On the face of it, that seems correct. If China has multiple stacks to pick from why wouldn't we want them to pick our stack? But do they have such a choice? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tsunamifury 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
He has been openly advocating to selling to China. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | flowerlad 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Another is the pretense of overcoming Chinese resistance. China sent a cute spy to bang the CEO of Nvidia, but they simultaneously set a "strict limit" on import of Nvidia chips. How does that make sense? It makes sense if the purpose of the "strict limit" is so that any sale of H200 to China can be seen as overcoming Chinese restrictions. Anything that is against the Chinese government's resistance must be good for the US, right? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||