I do like how the people who expressed skepticism at the media then aren't talking now in this thread.

The top comment is attempting to trivialize the news...

...because HN's title is editorialized, and exacerbates the linked statement.

It’s really not for anyone with a modicum of experience and knowledge around corporate boards.

It is editorialized, and doesn't match the title or contents of the statement.

HN has a rule about titles to avoid derailed threads like this.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Eh, the original title is meaningless. “A Statement” isn’t a title. It’s common for functionally untitled works to get a title here. All of which distracts from the misinformation that Huang is not being investigated by his Board.