Remix.run Logo
▲ stymaar an hour ago

The big problem for Tesla is that they cannot sustain their valuation from the car manufacturing business. There's a perpetual need to justify why Tesla should be valued an order of magnitude more than other automakers. Selling the dream of future profit is Tesla's main business.

(For the record Tesla makes roughly 10% of Toyota's profits and has almost 3 times the valuation, no Tesla shareholder is ready for a 97% share price drop so Tesla has to keep the dream machine at full steam).

Edit: Tesla is 3 times Toyota in valuation, not 5 as I said earlier, not that it changes the argument much.

▲tarsinge 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I don’t know, I think at this point the Tesla stock doesn’t have a link with the company anymore and behaves like any meme coin or collectible token. Like in crypto there is some vague narrative about a crazy future but ultimately the point is only to drive further speculation ("buy it before you’re priced out/join the elite crowd that’ll own the future/etc."). The genius of Elon is having realized (I’d say around the time he tested the ground with pumping dogecoin) that in a stock market where investors don’t buy for dividends but only price speculation the underlying business doesn’t really matter, only the narrative does. Dividends are the only link with the real business, without them the price is only a function of the demand, and what Elon has achieved is maintaining demand through narrative, like in crypto, irrelevant of the company results.

▲fifilura an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can laugh at it, and most likely it will crash and burn.

But at the same time, maybe they are doing the correct analysis.

"If we stay here and grow fat the others will eat us. To infinity and beyond!".

100 years ago your business was your warehouse or your locomotive. These days, maybe your business is defined by your rate of change?

▲omgwtfbyobbq 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You should probably compare revenue instead of profit because Tesla and Toyota are at very different places in their development.

But Toyota still makes 3x Teslas revenue.

I'm guessing some of the 9x difference is speculative and some is because Tesla is all in on EVs/etc, which are doing well, and Toyota is still very much in ICEs, which aren't doing as well.

▲Reason077 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> "Edit: Tesla is 3 times Toyota in valuation, not 5 as I said earlier, not that it changes the argument much."

Per Google finance, Tesla's market cap today is $1.42T. Toyota's is ¥48.72T, or $307B USD. So that would make Tesla's valuation about 4.6 times Toyota's.

▲lesuorac 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

Sure and Toyota [1] has significantly more outstanding bonds than Tesla [2] which should depress it's market cap.

[1]: https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/TSE-7203/bonds/

[2]: https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NASDAQ-TSLA/bonds/

▲origini 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tesla and Space-X.

▲stymaar 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

Until the merger with xAI, spaceX was actually a decent company with a very solid business, a clear technological edge and clear growth perspective. It shouldn't be a trillion dollar company of course, but it should have been a cash cow capturing all the value from its niche market.

Not anymore, I guess.

▲origini 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

But not with the valuation it currently has.

The only reason why Payload into space increased from 1000t to 3000t is Starlink.

And there they have also massive problems for scaling. Base Station is expensive and they have to replace the Satelites every 5 years. Withouth the v3 and rocket big enough to send it up, they can't scale properly.

If they then scale, the rate of atmosphere poisening through STarlink will increase.

▲ares623 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

SpaceX and Tesla are just another form of the Star Citizen phenomenon.

▲stymaar an hour ago | parent | next [-]

That's an awesome analogy, I'm stealing it right away.

▲santoshalper an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

"Irrational exuberance" is, I believe, the most concise description.

▲hparadiz an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

They are a battery company. The cars are just a way to sell batteries.

▲Reason077 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> "They are a battery company."

Not really. Tesla, like most automakers, purchases most of its battery cells from other companies (Panasonic, CATL, LG Chem). In recent years they have started to manufacture their own cells as well, with their 4680 cell manufacturing line at "Giga Texas". But this is a small portion of the cells they use globally.

▲hdgvhicv an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Very expensive batteries compared to the competition

▲stymaar an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The comparison is actually even worse if you compare it to other companies on the battery sector. How is Tesla supposed to be five times more than CATL ffs?

▲petcat an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The cars are actually a way to drive yourself around town. Yes they also contain batteries.