| ▲ | dingaling911 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Science starts with a hypothesis. If DNA has everything encoded, then it stands to reason that it influences the initial state of the brain. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wernam 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> If DNA has everything encoded It is not. There are many biological examples of random processes generating patterns and weights, such tiger stripes, fingerprints, etc. DNA only encodes the reaction, but the pattern itself is seeded by initial position of random molecules, not the DNA. > that it influences the initial state of the brain. You've gone from "DNA is probably the seed for the random initialization", as in the deterministic seed for a PRNG, to "influences". Those are 2 different claims. Most scientists will agree that DNA encodes the large-scale connectivity in the brain, ie from region to region, thickness of corpus callosum etc. Most scientists will disagree that it is "probable" that DNA encodes/seeds the weights of each and every synapse. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||