I insist on reviewing every line of code. But in the last few weeks I realized that LLMs are simply better than me at reviewing code too and I'm just finding excuses to not do the real work, which is to write more prompts.

▲

0c3ca83 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Have you considered asking them to write the prompts?

▲

raincole 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I have been asking LLMs to review/edit prompts since GPT4o era, so I really don't know what the point of this snarky comment is.

Since GPT4o, I have been convinced that most of the digital work would be done by AI and humans' job is to "move the chairs around to not block AI's way." It's a given to me. I'm just debating whether reading the code makes me a better chair-remover.

	▲	cudgy 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Don’t think it was snarky. My guess is op is just suggesting that you could automate further, but you are ratcheting toward it one step at a time while op is suggesting to allow the ai more autonomy.