Also to make it clear, I am not saying the code itself is better, but the end-product and what the user sees and gets. Like that saying "if it's stupid, but it works, then it's not stupid"

▲

sixtram 6 hours ago | parent [-]

for you, "if it's stupid, but it works, then it's not stupid."

for me, if it's stupid, but it works, then it's a coincidence.

	▲	XCSme 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I think LLMs themselves are a good example of "it's stupid but it works"