| ▲ | detourdog 5 hours ago | |||||||
Not trying to normalize usage in anyway. I just wonder if a behavior is well represented in a society is it still a disorder? The behavior while under the influence should get labeled but the usage might be normal. People being angry or not taking responsibility deserves a label from the DSM. If a large population is ingesting things this might be normal. | ||||||||
| ▲ | throwup238 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The DSM defines substance use disorder as (roughly) a problematic pattern of substance use that produces clinically significant impairment or distress, demonstrated by at least two of eleven diagnostic criteria within a twelve month period. It’s not a question of how well represented it is, but the effects it has on the person’s life. Drinking coffee or alcohol or taking prescription medication every day doesn’t qualify as a disorder as long as there’s no negative impact. Note also that GP said “at one point in their lives”, not that a third or half the world has a substance problem at any given time. A five cup a day coffee addict who quit and had headaches that negatively impacted their work life could qualify, so it’s not all hard drug use either (mostly binge drinking iirc). | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | cluckindan 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It might be that some sort of intoxication is the normal and abstaining from intoxication is the thing that’s normalized. | ||||||||